Steel & Metal Building Erectors Directory
Search for Erectors:

 Home  |  Articles  |  Ask The Experts  |  Classifieds  |  Directory  |  For The Pros  |  Glossary  |  Jobs  |  Quotes   

Steel Building Erectors Article: How to Select a Contractor, Erector and Manufacturer.
The Erectors.com steel erection article archive consists of erector related tips, news and articles on a wide variety of topics. If you have a steel or metal building erection article that you wish to submit, please visit our Erectors Article Submission page.




ERECTORS ARTICLES - How to Select a Contractor, Erector and Manufacturer.

A fond Hello to readers of "SEEING RED" (RED MC-1) HOW TO SELECT A CONTRACTOR, ERECTOR AND MANUFACTURER? This seems to be a popular question and one which I delight in giving my "expert" opinion thereon. Keep in mind that 42 years in the dynamic field of Pre-Engineered Steel Structures will probably taint my reply with some bias.

The "coming of age" of the Pre-Engineered Steel Structures has given thousands of good, knowlegeable, General Contractors the ability to become DESIGN--BUILD experts with major SINGLE SOURCE responsibility. To me, that is a giant advantage for the Builder and his client. The Builder associates him/her self with their architect/engineer friends who work as a team to assure the client the utmost value for his/her investment. The contractor I would pick would be one with 5 years minimum, preferably 10 years of local experience and projects to view and discuss with the owner and/or tenants. An exception to the criteria would be a Key man who had been in charge of multiple projects for the long experienced contractor and had opened up his own Construction Co. at least two years prior. Why? Sometimes they are more competitive with lower overhead and often supervise their own projects rather than having a qualified superintendent on the payroll which is not possible with a more established firm having multiple projects going on at the same time.

Client needs to assure himself that competent supervision would be on his job from start to finish at least 3 to 4 hours ea. day during the time sub-contractors and tradesmen are working.

The design--build team gives the Client a personal and ongoing "insider" responsibility in preliminary layout plans, budget and schedules with the only cost liability being the preliminary plan. The contractor's services to that point are "free" as part of their sales costs.

With a firm budget (plus or minus 10 percent) pending final plans and engineering, the client can now perceive the whole picture and economics and has developed a close and friendly relationship with the Contractor which generates mutual trust.

At that point, Client should not be concerned with who is the supplier of the structure and the erection thereof. He cannot second guess the knowledge of the Contractor who is now solely responsible for the finished product. He should also be privy to Contractors "hoped for" gross profit and overhead markup which normally range from 12 to 22 per cent depending on job size and complexity.

The above method of mutual cooperation in arriving at a negotiated contract is the one my company followed almost exclusively for 40 years. Yes, we did bid on some by invitation and built several military and municipal facilities but found that successful low bidders are often in conflict with outside inspectors, the Architect and owners over interpretations of plans, specs, intent, etc., - seldom a friendly situation.

We continue to believe that the Design - Build, single source responsibility results in the lowest VALUE cost because it enlists the full practical knowledge of the Contractor over years of experience and his Architects and Engineer Associates into a team with a personal interest in giving the client the most value for his Money!








Signup for Directory  |  Signup for Classifieds Ad  |  Submit Article  |  Submit Jobs  |  Contact Us